Research note. Open letter to the users of the new PubMed: a critical appraisal

dc.contributor.authorGarcía Puente, María
dc.contributor.authorPastor Ramon, Elena
dc.contributor.authorAgirre, Oskia
dc.contributor.authorMorán, José María
dc.contributor.authorHerrera Peco, Ivan
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-28T16:00:00Z
dc.date.available2021-06-28T16:00:00Z
dc.date.created2020-06
dc.description.abstractPubMed is a free database used daily by about 2.5 million people to search and retrieve scientific documents related to Health Sciences. In May 2020, certain changes were made to its search algorithm, which at first sight improves the location of scientific articles, but upon analyzing its operation in more depth, we detected some changes that make the reproducibility of bibliographic searches difficult. In order to safeguard the reproducibility and replicability of the searches carried out for systematic reviews, narratives and meta-analyzes, we suggest accompanying these strategies with a file in a format compatible with reference managers, to facilitate comparison and verification of the strategy to be replicated in a future. Keywords PubMed; Information storage and retrieval; Search engines; Databases; Search algorithms; User-computer interface; Reproducibility of results.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.identifier.locationN/Aes_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/24553
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.rightsCC-BYes_ES
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.eses_ES
dc.titleResearch note. Open letter to the users of the new PubMed: a critical appraisales_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES

Files

Collections