Randomized Phase III Trial of Erlotinib versus Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Squamous Cell Non¿Small Cell Lung Cancer Failing First-Line Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy Stratified by VeriStrat Good versus VeriStrat Poor. The European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP) EMPHASIS-lung Trial

dc.contributor.authorLópez Martín, Ana
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T09:49:52Z
dc.date.available2024-02-05T09:49:52Z
dc.date.created2017-04
dc.date.issued2017-04
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Docetaxel and erlotinib are registered second line treatments for wild-type EGFR NSCLC. Previous studies suggested a predictive value of the VeriStrat test in second line therapy of NSCLC, classifying patients as either VeriStrat good or VeriStrat poor. EMPHASIS-lung aimed at exploring this predictive effect in patients with squamous cell NSCLC. The trial closed prematurely because of low accrual and re sults from other trials. Our analysis includes an exploratory combined analysis with results from the PROSE trial. Methods: EMPHASIS-lung was a randomized phase III multicenter trial exploring the differential effect of second line erlotinib versus docetaxel on progression-free survival (PFS) in VeriStrat good versus VeriStrat poor patients with squamous cell NSCLC. Results: A total of 80 patients were randomized, with 72.5% categorized as VeriStrat good. Patient characteristics were balanced between VeriStrat status and treatment groups. The median PFS times with docetaxel and erlotinib treatment in the VeriStrat good cohort were 4.1 and 1.6 months, respectively, versus 1.9 and 2.1 months, respec tively, in the VeriStrat poor cohort. The median overall survival (OS) times with docetaxel and erlotinib treatment in the VeriStrat good cohort were 7.8 and 8.4 months, respectively, and 4.4 and 5.2 months, respectively, in the VeriStrat poor cohort. An additional exploratory analysis was performed; in it, 47 patients from the squamous cell subgroup of PROSE were included in a combined analysis, contributing with 45 PFS and 41 OS events. Conclusions: The final analysis of EMPHASIS-lung did not show a differential effect on PFS for erlotinib versus docetaxel stratified by VeriStrat status. Similarly, in the combined analysis, no significant treatment by VeriStrat status inter action was observed (interaction p ¼0.24 for PFS and 0.45 for OS, stratified by study). 2017 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: NSCLC; Squamous; Erlotinib; Docetaxel; ETOP; VeriStrates_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.identifier.locationN/Aes_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/39501
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.rightsCC-BYes_ES
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.eses_ES
dc.titleRandomized Phase III Trial of Erlotinib versus Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Squamous Cell Non¿Small Cell Lung Cancer Failing First-Line Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy Stratified by VeriStrat Good versus VeriStrat Poor. The European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP) EMPHASIS-lung Triales_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PIIS1556086416336073.pdf
Size:
1.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.76 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections