The Efficacy of Rotary, Reciprocating, and Combined Non-Surgical Endodontic Retreatment Techniques in Removing a Carrier-Based Root Canal Filling Material from Straight Root Canal Systems: A Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis

dc.contributor.authorAlakabani, Tarek-Fahed
dc.contributor.authorFaus Llácer, Vicente
dc.contributor.authorFaus Matoses, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Sánchez, Celia
dc.contributor.authorZubizarreta Macho, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorSauro, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorFaus Matoses, Vicente
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-01T15:25:44Z
dc.date.available2021-03-01T15:25:44Z
dc.date.created2020-06-25
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to analyze and compare the e cacy of three non-surgical endodontic retreatment techniques in removing a carrier-based root canal filling material from straight root canal systems. The study was performed on 99 single-rooted extracted teeth using the ProTaper Gold endodontic rotary system up to the F2 file (Dentsply Maillefer, Baillagues, Switzerland), which were sealed with GuttaCore (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and AH plus epoxy resin sealer (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) and randomly assigned to the following non-surgical retreatment techniques: ProTaper Retreatment endodontic rotary instruments (D1¿D3 files, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland; n = 33, PTR), Reciproc Blue endodontic reciprocating instrument (R50, VDW, Munich, Germany; n = 33, RCB50), and a combined root canal retreatment technique between Gates-Glidden drills (sizes #3 and #2, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and Hedstrom files (file size 35, 30, and 25, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland; n = 33; H-GG). All of the teeth were submitted twice to a micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scan, before and after non-surgical endodontic retreatment procedures. The volume of root canal filling material (mm3), volume of remaining root canal filling material (mm3), non-surgical endodontic retreatment working time (min), proportion of remaining root canal filling material (%), and e cacy of root canal filling material removal between the non-surgical endodontic retreatment techniques were analyzed using ANOVA one-way statistical analysis. Statistically significant di erences were observed between the proportions of remaining root canal filling material of PTR and H-GG (p = 0.018), between the non-surgical endodontic retreatment working times (min; p < 0.001), and between the e cacies of root canal filling material removal by the non-surgical endodontic retreatment techniques (p = 0.009). However, the non-surgical endodontic retreatment systems allow for similar carrier-based root canal filling material removal.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.identifier.locationN/Aes_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/24063
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.rightsCC-BYes_ES
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.rights.uriN/Aes_ES
dc.titleThe Efficacy of Rotary, Reciprocating, and Combined Non-Surgical Endodontic Retreatment Techniques in Removing a Carrier-Based Root Canal Filling Material from Straight Root Canal Systems: A Micro-Computed Tomography Analysises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES

Files

Collections